However, it is worth considering how revisionist historians will interpret Bush. It is inevitable.

I was at a conference panel on historical analogies and the Iraq war and an audience member noted that historians used to claim that Eisenhower was stupid but that his historical reputation has shifted dramatically, and then he asked how the panelists think Bush will be reassessed. The panelists, to their shame, said "oh, no, Bush will always be reviled." But since this is certainly not the case, it is definitely worth beginning to consider in what ways Bush might be reassessed.

Of course, this clown is not done damaging the country, and we haven't yet been able to catalog all of the myriad crimes of this administration, which are many by all indications...